Admin Login

 
- DTN Headline News
Soil Sampling Gets Up to Speed
Friday, July 31, 2015 9:14AM CDT

By Emily Unglesbee
DTN Staff Reporter

ST. LOUIS (DTN) -- Tom McGraw has seen a lot of changes in agriculture over the past six decades, but soil sampling isn't one of them.

"We haven't gotten professional enough at it yet," the owner of ag consulting group Tom McGraw Consulting told a crowd gathered for the 20th annual InfoAg Conference in St. Louis. "We have to shape up and do better."

The importance of improving the quality of soil sampling was a popular topic at this year's InfoAg conference, an event produced by the International Plant Nutrition Institute to showcase the latest developments in precision agriculture.

As agricultural software companies develop increasingly sophisticated data analysis and mapping software to examine and use soil samples for variable-rate fertilizer and nutrient application, the sampling method itself has remained stubbornly low-tech, labor-intensive and vulnerable to human error.

However, a smattering of companies are now bringing automated soil sampling equipment to the market, ranging from small ATV attachments to tractor-hauled units. They hope automation can help improve the lowly but crucial step of securing a quality soil sample that will determine how a farmer spends valuable time and money improving the fertility of his field.

RELYING ON AN OLD TOOL

Allan Baucom has been using grid soil sampling on his farm in North Carolina for nearly 20 years. "Soil sampling has always been a chore," he told DTN. For decades, farmers have walked their fields and taken soil samples by plunging a hollow metal probe into the ground to a designated depth and then depositing the resulting core of soil into a container.

Most experts recommend fields be broken into 2.5-acre grids for sampling with at least 12 cores taken for each sample, so the process can be extremely time consuming, McGraw said.

Given the potential for the wide variability even within a 2.5-acre region of soil, the chances for unrepresentative samples are quite high, he added.

Other complicating factors include the moisture and temperature of the field's soils, the time of year, the field's tillage history, soil compaction, the freeze-thaw cycle, and the fact that nutrient levels vary by soil depth.

Add human error to the equation -- cores taken at inconsistent depths, too close or too far apart, and not mixed properly -- and the chances of reliable, representative and consistent samples sink even lower, McGraw said.

Yet the integrity of each soil sample is critically important for every step that comes afterward. The data gleaned from the soil lab analyses, the field maps generated from that data, and the decisions the farmer makes in adding fertilizer and nutrients are all based on the dirt that finds its way into the soil sampling bucket back in the field.

"With the economic situation now, it's more important than ever that all your inputs are used as precisely and accurately as possible," Baucom noted. "So the quality of that sample is really important."

AUTOMATING THE PROCESS

Even with employees trained specifically to sample soils on Baucom's 14,000 acres of cotton, corn, soybeans, wheat and vegetables, he knew the samples were likely not perfect.

"There's still the opportunity for inconsistency and variability," he said. "We tried everything -- hydraulics, drills, all these different tools -- but it all amounted to us doing it the same way we've always done it. We were taking a core manually."

So Baucom launched Falcon Soil Technologies and designed an automated soil sampling unit that can be towed by a pickup and controlled from your laptop. "We wanted it to be simple, functional and farmer tough," he said.

The 2,200-pound unit contains a 5-foot-tall hollow stainless-steel wheel with a probe attached. As the wheel rotates, the probe plunges into the ground every 15 feet to collect a core, mixes them, and when prompted, funnels them into a rotating carousel that can hold up to 12 samples. A GPS unit on board logs the location of every soil core taken, and the final sample is imprinted with a bar code. A box in the back of the unit can store multiple carousels of samples.

The company recommends field speeds of 8 to 12 mph, which allow the Falcon unit to collect 40 or more cores every minute.

The Falcon 5000 soil sampling unit costs $58,850 and joins a growing number of other automated soil sampling machines on the market.

For two years, Jim and Jeff Burton's company, AutoProbe Technologies, has been selling a soil sampling attachment designed to be pulled by any tractor with a 3-point hitch and hydraulics.

The AutoProbe unit consists of a rubber track with a probe that collects a soil core every 8.5 feet. The core is blown through tubes into the cab of the tractor and into a sample bag that can be switched out by the driver. Jim is proud of AutoProbe's speed; the company claims a tractor moving 5 to 7 mph can sample 150 acres in just an hour. The unit lists at $64,900, and Jeff said 36 of the machines are now running on farms from North Carolina to Alberta, Canada.

On the lower end of the cost and equipment spectrum are smaller automated soil sample units such as the Wintex 1000 from Precision Technologies, which retails at $8,250. This small soil sampling unit attaches to the back of an ATV, and the company claims it can take 38 soil samples (of 12 cores each) in an hour.

While automated soil sampling equipment can't take all the variability out of soil sampling, it can improve the consistency of soil cores and lower the chance for human error, Baucom said.

"The goal is to get a good, representative, homogeneous sample of that ground that can be validated and replicated," he said.

Emily Unglesbee can be reached at emily.unglesbee@dtn.com

Follow Emily Unglesbee on Twitter @Emily_Unglesbee

(PS/AG)


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Katie Micik
Markets Editor
Monday, July 27, 2015 7:01PM CDT
Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:40PM CDT
Monday, July 20, 2015 3:45PM CDT
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Sunday, August 2, 2015 6:06PM CDT
Sunday, August 2, 2015 4:24PM CDT
Sunday, August 2, 2015 4:00PM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Friday, July 31, 2015 9:00PM CDT
Thursday, July 30, 2015 2:34PM CDT
Thursday, July 23, 2015 3:20PM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Friday, July 31, 2015 9:17PM CDT
Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:00PM CDT
Monday, July 27, 2015 4:35PM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Tuesday, July 28, 2015 9:41PM CDT
Monday, July 27, 2015 6:27PM CDT
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:57PM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Monday, August 3, 2015 12:33AM CDT
Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:33PM CDT
Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:48PM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, July 24, 2015 8:10PM CDT
Monday, July 13, 2015 7:07PM CDT
Friday, June 19, 2015 7:19PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Friday, July 31, 2015 5:58PM CDT
Friday, July 17, 2015 7:58PM CDT
Thursday, July 2, 2015 6:04PM CDT
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Thursday, July 30, 2015 2:47PM CDT
Monday, July 27, 2015 7:59PM CDT
Friday, July 17, 2015 4:25PM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Monday, July 27, 2015 9:53PM CDT
Tuesday, July 21, 2015 3:18PM CDT
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 11:25AM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Monday, August 3, 2015 4:47PM CDT
Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:04PM CDT
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:18PM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Friday, July 24, 2015 9:27PM CDT
Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:19PM CDT
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 10:00PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:02PM CDT
Tuesday, July 14, 2015 7:45PM CDT
Wednesday, July 8, 2015 7:45PM CDT
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN